Friday, February 27, 2009

WEEK 7B BLOG

The Rocky Mountain News, one of the oldest newspapers in the U.S. (began publication in 1859), submitted it's final publication today and will end operations after it was unable to find a buyer.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090227/ap_on_bi_ge/rocky_mountain_news_closes

Likewise, Yahoo.com reports that

Four owners of 33 U.S. daily newspapers have sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the past 2 1/2 months. A number of other newspapers are up for sale.

With the economic climate being what it is, it seems that less and less people are buying newspapers and are, instead, turning to internet and television sources for their news, making things even worse economically for print media.

Banks have been receiving "bailout" money from the government to keep these essential institutions in business. Are newspapers just as essential and should they be given the same consideration as banks when it comes to so many of them going out of business? Is the internet an acceptable / reliable alternative if this trend continues and more newspapers fail? (due 3/3)

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

WEEK 7A BLOG

The Republican governor's of several states (Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alaska, South Carolina, Idaho) have stated that they are considering rejecting at least some of the monies granted to their states through the new economic stimulus package.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090219/ap_on_bi_ge/bucking_the_stimulus

Do you see this as simple political maneuvering (putting political ideology ahead of the needs of the citizens) or is this a matter of trying to make responsible choices as the leaders of those repective states? (due 2/27)

Friday, February 20, 2009

WEEK 6B BLOG

Nadya Suleman gave birth to octuplets in Southern California. Afterwards, information began leaking out about this woman and the family such as the facts that she already had six children, is not married, does not have a job, is living on welfare, lives in the home of her mother, etc. It has also been reported that she had these children because she was "lonely" and actually used a fertility clinic to become pregnant (as it turns out, she had been rejected by clinics previously). Now, it looks as if she may be turning down assistance that has been offered...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/20/earlyshow/main4815110.shtml

Furthermore, they may end up losing their house...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,496169,00.html

Many people have publicly criticized her for many different things during this saga. What is your opinion on all of this? Is she irresponsible for making the decision to have these babies? Should this be any of the public's business at all? Should the government get involved in cases like this? (due 2/24)

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

WEEK 6A BLOG

Over the weekend, police in Connecticut had to shoot and kill a 175 pound pet chimpanzee who attacked a woman visiting it's owner's home. Should people be allowed to own exotic pets such as this, or should it be illegal everywhere? (due 2/20)

Friday, February 13, 2009

WEEK 5B BLOG

Earlier this week, singers Chris Brown and Rihanna cancelled their appearances on the Grammy Awards at the last minute. It was later revealed that Brown had been arrested on suspicion of making a criminal threat after he was allegedly involved in an assault on a woman. Though it has not been confirmed by police, it has been reported that the victim was Rihanna. In the wake of this, several radio stations across the country decided to pull Brown's music from their airwaves, only to begin playing it again a few days later. Was the decision to pull his music proper or a rash decision? Do you agree with the decision to put the music back on the air? Should these decisions be made based on allegations? (DUE 2/17)

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

WEEK 5A BLOG

This first clip (compliments of YouTube and 60 Minutes) is an interview from 2007 in which Katie Couric asks Alex Rodriguez about steroid use...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RgCDpqTJYw

This second clip (also compliments of YouTube and ESPN) is yesterday's interview in which Alex Rodriguez admits to using performance enhancing drugs to Peter Gammons...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20h9hY0IDo4

Your thoughts? Do you "buy" his explanation? Do you think that he only apologized because he got caught? Does this sully his reputation? Should this change the way we view his performance / stats? Does this hurt his chances at getting into the Hall of Fame? Does he immediately fall into the same category as the others accused of steroid use? Should he be punished? etc. (DUE 2/12)

Friday, February 6, 2009

WEEK 4B BLOG

The following quotes come from the Associated Press...

Timothy Geithner was confirmed as treasury secretary despite belatedly paying $34,000 in income taxes

Tom Daschle is still waiting to see if his late payment of more than $128,000 in income taxes will harm his nomination to be health and human services secretary. He officially withdrew his nomination on Tuesday.

Obama's first choice for commerce secretary, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, took his name out of consideration when his confirmation appeared headed toward complications because of a grand jury investigation over how state contracts were issued to political donors.

Nancy Killefer, who failed for a year and a half to pay employment taxes on household help, withdrew her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer for the federal government on Tuesday.

Are these revelations an alarming trend concerning the character of the people being chosen for the new administration or an unfortunate set of circumstances that should not reflect negatively on President Obama? (DUE 2/10)

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

NEW REQUIREMENTS WEEKS 4-6

Don't forget that during Weeks 4 - 6 all students need to respond to another student's posted answer in addition to posting their own answer to the question provided. These should be done on two seperate posts, not on the same one! This begins with the Week 4A Blog.

WEEK 4A BLOG

Late last week, President Obama signed a bill that included a provision aimed at encouraging the public to "buy American." This has been met by some anger amongst our primary trading partners because the thought is that if the government urges us to specifically buy American goods, it takes away from the products that might be sold by those other countries. During these difficult economic times, is this a good idea or do you think that it could be a negative thing? What might be the differences in the short term and in the long run? (DUE 2/5)